In the fast-moving world of AI, innovative applications can skyrocket to fame (or notoriety) almost instantly. DeepSeek R1, a powerful open-source AI model developed by a Chinese company of the same name, recently surged to the top of the Apple Store charts, drawing widespread attention from both both financial markets and enterprises. Within just a week, the app amassed over 500,000 downloads, demonstrating the high demand for alternative AI solutions outside of dominant players like OpenAI and Google. However, with such swift success comes pressing concerns about data security, regulatory compliance, and the hidden risks of shadow AI.
‍
Whenever a new AI application gains traction, it brings with it serious questions about data residency, governance, and security posture. Many SaaS applications, including AI models, process vast amounts of data, some of which may be sensitive. Without proper scrutiny, organizations may unknowingly expose intellectual property, personally identifiable information (PII), or other confidential data to external platforms.
‍
For businesses adopting AI tools like DeepSeek, understanding where their data is stored and how it is processed is critical. Meanwhile, many AI companies do not clearly disclose their data handling practices, leaving users vulnerable to compliance risks. This lack of transparency is especially concerning for enterprises operating in regulated industries where data sovereignty and security requirements are strict.
‍
Recently, DeepSeek suffered a major Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack that caused widespread service disruptions and temporarily prevented new user registrations. This incident underscored the vulnerability of emerging AI platforms to cyber threats, further highlighting the need for stronger security measures to ensure platform reliability and user trust.
‍
DeepSeek represents a significant advancement for the open-source AI community. It provides an alternative to closed models and allows researchers and developers to build upon its capabilities. However, this openness comes with challenges, particularly in the realm of content moderation and censorship.
‍
China-based AI models, including DeepSeek, must comply with strict regulatory guidelines. Topics such as Taiwan, Xi Jinping, and the Tiananmen Square massacre are heavily censored. While this aligns with local policies, it raises concerns about AI neutrality, and whether global users can trust these models to provide unbiased information. As AI continues to evolve, the question of who controls the flow of information—and how censorship is enforced—remains a critical issue.
‍
Shadow AI refers to AI tools and services used within an organization without official approval or security oversight. To improve their productivity, employees may integrate AI-powered applications into their workflows without IT or security teams being aware, introducing risks such as data leakage, compliance violations, and potential security breaches.
‍
With AI becoming more accessible, the proliferation of shadow AI is inevitable. At Nudge Security, we’ve watched the number of unique AI tools nearly double each quarter since 2023. Organizations that fail to monitor and manage AI adoption could find themselves exposed to legal and cybersecurity threats. Unvetted AI tools may not comply with internal policies, industry regulations, or security best practices, leading to unforeseen consequences.
‍
Managing shadow AI requires a proactive approach to security and governance. Nudge Security helps organizations discover and secure AI adoption within their environments. By providing visibility into AI adoption and usage patterns, Nudge Security enables IT teams to:
‍
‍
You can get a full inventory of all AI accounts ever created by anyone in you org with a free 14-day trial of Nudge Security. Find out today if anyone in your org is using DeepSeek, or other tools that may not have been vetted by IT security.
‍
